From hxjofzc@263.net Mon Jun 28 12:24 MET 1999 From: hxjofzc@263.net Date: 28 Jun 1999 14:36:33 -0000 Message-ID: <19990628143633.394.fmail@263.net> Reply-To: hxjofzc@263.net To: webmestre@diplomatie.fr Cc: webmaster@adminet.com Subject: Europe and Kosovo(1) Dear Sir, I am HXJ, an Chinese. I find my articles, which wrote on May 8, still have not become old. Therefore, I send them to you again. There are four: 'What is behind the Kosovo warfare?(99.3.25)', 'Kosovo --- falling of the European Union and the Split of the NATO(99.4.05)', 'the reason of bombing Chinese Embassy(99.5.08)', and 'Uniting or not and the crucial point(99.6.24)'. These group articles should be read together. It is nessary to say that I have send them to many country. Therefore, USA maybe has know them. Yours, HXJ What is behind the Kosovo warfare?(99.3.25) Seemingly, the act of air raid on Kosovo is for the humanism. In fact, the United States is carrying out a plan to deter the development of Europe. USA will take great advantage. After the cold war, the competition between capitals is becoming increasingly tense. For example, The Asian financial crisis, which might not be made by USA, occurred last year. However, the World Bank, which is manipulated by USA, worsened the crisis by delaying to offer loans to those countries which were badly hit by the crisis. By intention or not? Only God knows. As far as we know, the economy of USA is at its best with Dow Jones index rising all the way. The ASEAN capitals, which once had been the potential threat to the American capitals, now can not threat USA, furthermore need a few years to recover. The Gulf War is another example from which USA gained a lot. Ever since the end of the Gulf War, the oil price fell gradually. Being the world biggest oil consumer, USA saves a big money. Maybe it was reasonable to remain army at the Gulf in the past, but now more and more people do not agree this act again. 'Oh, take it easy, don't worry about it!' the American will say like this. Because if there is American army at the Gulf, there will have no stability at the Gulf, and the oil price will not increase, and USA will keep on gaining. Now, there has no cry for energy crisis in USA. There is the Gulf crisis, so nobody will be afraid of energy crisis. Now here comes the Kosovo crisis. Balkan, the barrel of explosives, is in war. If there is no peace in Kosovo, there is no peace in Yugoslavia and there is no peace in the neighboring countries, and whole Europe will not be stable again. Then, the European capital can not focus on growing any longer and the European capital has no chance to grow faster than the American's does. Let the Europeans stuck in the troubled water. USA can march on to the Asian market, African market and even the European market. Let us look around the world. Who can compete with USA in economy? Europe and Japan are the only two rivals of USA. Japan is too small to grow, so it is not the real rival. The Europeans have worked for decades to have their European Union, but as there is whole mess in Kosovo, there is no grow of the European capital, and the Union for Europeans is useless. The European capital is not a rival any more. What will USA lost? First, some unlucky soldiers will die. Second, the world public opinion will blame USA. Third, the public opinion of USA will blame government and some parades against warfare will come off. At most, the American government who can not deal with the matter in the future will resign. By any means, any actual important vantage will not be paid out. What we must impress is, if tactic is made by heart, all the defects we refer upward will be avoided. The investment is so small and the interests are so large, whoever will miss this kind of chance? As we know, the Bosnia and Montenegro crisis has not brought bankruptcy to European economy. Now Kosovo crisis will help. European economy will be depressed for years ahead and even will be bankrupt forever. By then, the Americans can not help laughing in their dreams. In Europe, some countries participate in the bombing of Kosovo. What can they get from it? Being sold by the others, you help to count money for the sellers. The Americans are the troublemakers instead of peacekeepers. By setting fire on Kosovo, USA can achieve the following three goals: selling their weapons, letting the Europeans challenge the Russians, deterring the European economy. If I were Bill Clinton, I would like to fish in the troubled water, why not. Poor Balkan people. Who would take care of them? Kosovo --- falling of the European Union and the Split of the NATO(99.4.05) The world is developing toward multi-pole forces and this is the trend of the history. USA learns that it is impossible to prevent this trend. He also learns that it is possible to delay this trend, or to occupy the advantage position in the future world of multi-pole forces through striking his rivals hard. Of course, this effort must be under the premise of not hurting his profits nowadays and in the future, Which force could be the first threaten of USA? Is it China? Maybe China could be the biggest rival in political propaganda, but actually, it is not. China is still a developing country. USA could not be such a fool for ignoring this fact. He just takes China as pretence. Could it be Russia? It could only be the opponent against USA in military, not a threat in economy at all. If war really occurred, USA could defeat Russia very quickly in economy. Then, it must be Japan. But Japan could only be a rival more in economy than in military. What is more is that Japan is totally under USA military control through TDM plan and US-Nippon security pact. There is only European Union, which can challenge USA in economy, politics, military and culture. For example, as soon as Euro comes into currency circulation, US dollars faces its opponent. While the European integrity goes on smoothly, Germany has gained confidence from its neighbors by trying every means to wash out its dirty records in the Second World War. France wants to share power with USA over the control of NATO. The Europeans has set up Euro-Asian Conference. USA will lose control of whole Europe. USA will not allow this thing to happen. The America will never let an opponent to sleep beside his bed. USA is not willing to solve the Kosovo problem peacefully. If Kosovo is in turmoil, the Balkan is in turmoil, and so is the whole Europe. Therefore, the integrity of Europe will be delayed, and so is the development of Europe. Ever since the very beginning of NATO bombardment on Kosovo, the result of the warfare is clear. USA is the winner while the Europe is the loser. USA makes good use of NATO to invade a sovereign country Yugoslavia. The invasion will drag Europe onto the route of decay. USA takes big risk to go into war just to gain much bigger interests. Euro is no longer as strong as before. Of course, the western European countries have their aims in this crisis, but it is too puerile by contrast with USA. NATO-allies are a good name, but are not a good thing. For the sake of USA interest, USA carried out the Marshal Plan to help the western European countries after the Second World War. Now, for the sake of USA interest, has USA drawn up another plan to deter the development of Europe or not? Kosovo affair offered an opportunity for USA to depress its allies. USA will certainly not miss this good opportunity. Knowing that its real interests are in danger, European Union will not be cheated for long. The countries around Kosovo are suffering from the warfare. The interests of the European Union are against that of USA. While EU is trying its best to get the situation in Kosovo under control, USA is managing to make the matter worse. NATO will go split. There are three possibilities. A. The best policy is that some NATO countries such as France and Germany establish a new European security organization with Russia at once and keep UK and USA outside. The continental European organization will solve the Kosovo crisis by independently. They will not allow USA to interfere the European affairs. They will get Europe recovered from the crisis. This is the best strategy. For the relation of the European with USA, this kind of possibility is not so realistic. B. Another possibility is that EU will set up its own military organization passively. With NATO under the leadership of USA, the Kosovo crisis will be prolonged and European economy development will be affected. With the pressure of this affected, Some NATO countries will say good-bye to NATO too. In this situation, the European economy will have been affected deeply by the crisis. The invasion will have dragged Europe onto the route of decay. It is difficult to restore the status of EU in the world, but there is still some chance. This is a middle strategy. C. The third possibility is that the European NATO members all remain, and all the EU countries fall into the Kosovo crisis. There will be three results: First, the European NATO members will incur great expense in the Kosovo war. Second, they also will have to face a new cold war with Russia and they will be the shields of USA. Third, the development of European economy will depend on USA like the situation after the Second World War. The European NATO members should keep in mind what USA had done in African Somali. Once the situation in Kosovo become worse and worse, USA will run away, of course under the internal pressure of American people. Then the burden will rest upon EU to make the wrong thing right and this will break away with NATO. When this will be a fact, perhaps some countries will want to set up its own military organization, but it will only be a dream. At all events, NATO will split. Whatsoever it is ostensible or not, the split will be materially at least. It is only a matter of time. Which possibilities will the EU choice? _____________________________________________ 首都在线--先进中国人的网上家园 http://www.263.net 免费邮箱 邮件杂志 签名邮件 邮件加密 邮件追身呼 搜索引擎 个人站点 在线游戏 网上聊天 网上挂号 金融王国 在线杀毒 跳蚤市场 软件下载 休闲娱乐 From hxjofzc@263.net Mon Jun 28 12:24 MET 1999 From: hxjofzc@263.net Date: 28 Jun 1999 14:38:16 -0000 Message-ID: <19990628143816.1162.fmail@263.net> Reply-To: hxjofzc@263.net To: webmestre@diplomatie.fr Cc: webmaster@adminet.com Subject: Europe and Kosovo(2) The reason of bombing Chinese embassy (99.05.08 night) The first question: who did it? A. Three missiles-maybe circuit missiles or laser bombs that can precisely attack object, so it was impossible to be a mistake. (Now we know there were five in fact. According the analysis that was reported by military experts of China, they may belong to three types and each has its exact object. It was an act designed elaborately. It was impossible that NATO did not know what was the building. ----1999. 6.17 Just now, I know that the envoy of USA come to China to explain the reason of bombing Chinese Embassy. The explain is too raving to be believe. Even an ordinarily Chinese like me cannot accept the report. I do not understand why USA thinks this report can be accept. If my government had pretended not knowing the absurdity of the report, all of Chinese would disdain my government. Chinese nation is not a nation to be cheated easily. ------99.6.17) B. It is an act on purpose. However, many NATO countries are kind to China. Furthermore, such political risk can not be decided through discussing by many members. It only can be arranged secretly by the man who commands NATO army directly. C. As we all know, USA mastered the right of NATO indeed. Therefore, we can conclude that the bombing is made by American intention. The second question: What would happen after the booming? A. Bombing the Chinese embassy will actuate the antagonism between China and NATO. B. This antagonism will of course actuate the cooperation between China and Russia. C. Afterwards, perhaps the Kosovo crisis will upgrade. (Now we know the warfare was be prolonged in fact. However, if China lost his intellect at that time and encourage Russia acting toughly through Chinese money. I do not think that upgrade result is only a dream. ----1999. 6.17) D. Because Russia would get the holding from China on economy, the bombing would actuate the military conflict between Russia and NATO. With time went on, the conflict would upgrade. Then the third world war would become reality: USA and Europe are on this side, Russia and China are on the other side, Japan may be on west and India would perhaps support Russia. (This dangerous still exists: if someone should attack and kill the two hundred soldier of Russia in Kosovo, what would happen then? ----1999. 6.17 I am delight with the peace-keeping question in Kosovo was solved between USA and Russia. However, the dangerous still exists: UCK had announced the Russian Army is theirs enemy, if someone use this enmity, what will happen? ----99.6.18) The third question: whether USA is afraid of this situation? A. USA cannot control whole world by himself. However, his power is superpower, so if any international power united with USA, the union would control whole world. This is the biggest benefit of USA. B. However, this union, on the stand of USA, must be dominated by USA. So-called partner must be a DOG who can only sometimes get a bone. (Pardon me use this insulting word, but this is the USA' thought.----1999.6.17) There are three demands of USA according the current international situation. First, this partner cannot have friend and he had better have enemy everywhere thereby he have no way except becoming US dog. Second, it is necessary that this dog is not strong enough because it must be insured to be able to govern him when necessary. Third, it is necessary that this dog is strong enough thereby everyone can not ignore it being bitten by this dog. C. Except for USA, there are three international power centers, which really can not be disregarded by anyone in politics, economy, military power, and culture. Russia still has strength, which is retained from the past. European Union have grown up enough and is keeping on developing. China, as Napoleon said, this lion have wakened up and is still evolving rapidly. D. Russia never can not agree being the second class, at the same time, because his nuclear strength, he can not be essentially control by USA. E. If China would become the strategic partner of USA, China is in east and USA is in west, so it would be easy to control whole world. However, China demands independence in his foreign diplomatic policy and always has its own viewpoint. Although this union would be barely united through the endeavor of USA, USA do not really want to build this union because the lion will be strong and USA cannot manipulating China in future. (USA object China is not for Chinese social democracy but for Chinese power. ----1999.6.17) F. Although EU wants to unite all Europe, it still has not been finished. First, the process of united have not finished and there is no danger while USA joins this program and arranges this course. At that time, USA still has capability to manipulating Europe when it is necessary. Second, the traditional NATO is controlled by USA. It is easy to make the EU become little fellow of USA. Third, EU has sufficient strength. All these conditions are fit for America united a union through which control whole world. However, there are two disadvantages. First, EU is too strong to be manipulating, so it is necessary to decrease its strength in some pertinent extent. Second, EU has too many friends: a. EU is developing the relationship with ASEAN. b. Germany has intimate relationship with Russia on economy. c. EU is developing the relationship with China. G. Through the Asian financial crisis, it is beneficial to USA that ASEAN can not look after himself. It has had no trouble that EU develops relation with AESAN. Afterwards, here is Kosovo crisis. First, the strength of EU has been decrease in some extent. If there would be too much decrease, there would be USA succor and Europe would be remedy suitably. Second, because NATO, EU has become the opponent of Russia. EU will not be the real friend to Russia any more. Now, here is the bombing Chinese Embassy. This bombing is named NATO action although it was done by USA. Ha! Ha! No country of NATO can evade duty. How can EU develop friendship with China any more? As the situation became this condition, EU, having been pulled into troubled water, has no choice but follow USA. H. It is no problem of actuating the military conflict between Russia and NATO. In the prospective war, EU has no other way except to follow USA. More conflict, more antagonism. More conflict, more have no chance to transaction between EU with Russia. Because the power of USA, it is very much beneficial to USA in this situation. Yes, I America am afraid of the third world war. Nevertheless, either Russia or China will not be afraid of it, will they? In case of the war outbreak, it is better than later. When Russia would have recovered his power or China would have developed in future, it would be worse. If I America cannot control whole world, why give chance to others? I America prefer to see God with others together in the nuclear war. I. What USA dreaming of is that the USA is the host, EU and Japan are sword and shield, whole world is fish, pork and slave. This is the new international regulation that USA wants to build. Therefore, the purpose of bombing Chinese Embassy is to oblige China object EU, to oblige EU become USA fellow. This action is carefully devised by USA and it is serving the highest benefits of USA. The fourth question: the political risk is a risk. It would bring great interests when it success and it would lost most when it fail. Can the machination success? (If USA united with EU, it would be disadvantage to China. Being Chinese, I of course think the bombing is a machination. However, is it a machination for EU? When I wrote this essay, I thought it is nature that country of EU thinks like me, but now I find many European do not think so. There are complicated advantages and disadvantages. It is necessary to analyze this roundly. I have analyzed it in essay 'Uniting or not and the crucial point?' behind this essay. Please read it. ----1999. 6.17) A. It is first decided by China whether the USA purpose would success. If China of course object the bombing and object NATO: USA and EU, the purpose would success at once. Because I America has made US-Nippon security pact with Japan and has voted against Chinese record of human rights in UN human rights conference in1999, it is not accidental for USA being objected by China again. The most exciting thing is that EU will be objected by China. Oh, EU, come on, come to me America breast. Then, will china be cheated to help America in fact? (In fact, Chinese government and people have not been cheated after the event. On the second day after I wrote this essay, all Chinese was indignation but we Chinese all know it was made by US intentionally. When the premier of Germany come to China after the bombing, China have no real enmity to him although he had to say sorry for NATO. We are still waiting the reaction of USA and we shall not forgive USA forever if he shall not give us a satisfactory result, but we would not really object EU for this event. However, if EU thought there are more advantages than disadvantages if united with US, well then China had to united with Russia and object all west. ----1999. 6.17) B. EU will not be satisfactory at all for being the dog instead of independence. They will of course exert themselves to exculpate to China. However, they must know the real intention of USA first. (Not all of European people recognize this. Many European people are idealist. I appreciate this very much but I do not agree this. American is the benefit man. No interests, no American. ----1999. 6.17) C. The important thing that must be emphasized is that EU must guard against UK! UK who madly follows US is quite possibly the invisible hand behind USA. In history, others always lost many behalves in everything, which has relationship with UK except Hongkong being returned to China. UK is the sly fox who use the power of tiger to threaten other animals. Although his reputation is not well in many developing countries and the sun has fall, UK still has his most real benefit not to be injured. The democratic model of USA is three parts (Pardon me do not know the accurate word and invent this incorrect phrase but I think you know my meaning----1999. 6.17) which was highly praised. However, lots of political system of European countries do not come up to this model and Plato had said that the extreme democratic system was the worst political system which can do nothing but chaos. If UK who is sly very much had not united with US, US would not finish any great conquest. (Of course, this viewpoint is too excessive to underestimate USA. However, I want to emphasize that the UK has a great influence. EU benefit is not always the benefit of UK. When the EU become stronger, the influence of France and Germany will increase and the status of UK will decrease. Everyone knows this well. Although when EU decrease and UK would have some loss, UK would get more compensation from the action following America. Sell the Europe, then the gains belong to UK himself. For UK, the getting is more than his loss. This is what UK is doing. Two facts can prove this standpoint. First, English insist to refuse joining Euro and Euro has devalued ten percent. Have UK know the coming crisis in Kosovo? Second, the USA agrees UK to share in commanding NATO army but refuses France, Italy or Germany to participate. ----1999. 6.17) Uniting or not and the crucial point? (99.6.24) Would it be disadvantage to EU if EU were to unite with USA or not? Although this union controlled by US, according the analysis in 'the reason of bombing Chinese Embassy', I think two perspectives must be discussed: superficial situation and materially situation. Seemingly, although USA will not let EU decrease as he will not let EU freely develop, because USA need EU help him control world, EU will go on getting benefit from this union. Then, while this union is build, EU will not be afraid of anyone and EU will get enormous development. For example, whole Europe will be lead by EU. What a wonderful situation! However, while we analyze this union evolution, we will find an opposite result. This union will give EU four results in fact. A. Because USA is the host and EU is his fellow, USA will get benefit more than EU when allocate their income. B. Because USA must remain his ability controlling EU, he will not allow EU to develop freely. He will always interferes in the business of EU and sometimes directly destroys EU independence through all kinds of methods. EU can only develop in the range that US allow. C. Because the two reasons above, USA will develop quickly and EU will have no chance to chase and exceed USA. Someday, because the help of EU, USA will have capability control world himself and will not need EU any longer, EU will be the last enemy of USA and USA will discard EU without any question. In other words, uniting with USA is the way that EU brings himself to become slave. D. Because this union will damage other countries' benefit, all over the world will object this union. If this union would not be success in future, to support US himself, USA will bring EU out being a shield. EU will have no ability to refuse being cannon folder. On the contrary, if EU would refuse the control by USA and remain his independence, what would happen? A. The world will be developing toward multi-pole forces. There will be seven power centers: USA and his South America, EU and his Europe, Russia and his Independent Alliance Union (Pardon me invent this incorrect phrase because my ignorance), China, ASEAN, India, and Japan only on economy. Perhaps, there will be two weaker centers in Arab and in Africa. B. In this situation, the first one of course is USA, and the second must be EU. C. If EU has no capability to disobey USA directly, he could develop affinity with other power center and EU will not worry about anything. Then EU has a free surrounding to develop thoroughly. D. If EU has capability enough, he may challenge the status of USA or do other things himself. To sum up, it is obvious which situation is real advantage to EU. If united with US, EU will become cat's paws because US will not let EU have real equal status with him and EU will lost the large for the little. If remaining independence, the tomorrow of EU will be luminous. Of course, if EU has equal status with US in their union, there will be better future for EU, but it is impossible because, to USA, might is right. Therefore, although there are complicated advantage and disadvantages if EU unites with US, it is disadvantage to EU in materially situation. Whole Kosovo crisis is disadvantage to EU and the bombing Chinese Embassy is a machination to EU either. The international strategic benefit of China is as same as EU, so I exert myself to explain this fact to you European people in order to try for Chinese tomorrow which is EU tomorrow either. How to deal with Kosovo crisis is the crucial point that EU choice his fate for future. Being cannon folder to help USA control whole world in fact, or being the free power center to gain luminous tomorrow, now it is the time to choice. There are two ways. The first way is to choice being cannon folder. It is very easy. Obey the arrangement of US-UK, then fate of EU will become a bet in gambling of USA. There are two situations. First, if UCK obey USA either, the Kosovo will become the rein on EU, which can be loose or tight. A. If EU obeys US-UK arrangement, they will share the benefit of Kosovo with US-UK, but they will completely lost the control. Now, Clinton has announced that EU must dig down for Kosovo: 1. If EU would agree this attitude, his power will decrease. 2. If EU say no, UCK is controlled by USA in fact and he will not be peaceful. If necessary, the UCK who obey US will make some chaos. If Fr-De-It ran away, they would lose benefit and status, and the Kosovo crisis will expand to other part of Europe, then the EU will collapse. Therefore, they have to remain in Kosovo and follow USA. If EU united with USA in other international events, Kosovo will be peace. If EU want to independent, Kosovo will be chaos. In other words, EU has no chance except to unite with USA. B. US-EU will interfere in business of whole world and will exert themselves to control whole world. They will get many benefits. C. If the aim would be success, there would be no enemy. Then EU becomes the last enemy of USA and EU has no capability protect EU himself at all. The US control world himself. D. If the aim would fail, EU would be cannon folder. E. It is not absolute that this fate could not be change, but the procedure more evolve, more have no chance to change. Second, if USA could not control UCK at all, the situation will become worst. A. As time went on, the UCK will make more and more chaos, the Serbian in Kosovo will have to arm themselves and the conflict between Serbian and Albanian will be sanguinary. B. Although US-UK media will say this is also crime of Milosevic, but it is no use to European situation. Either UCK or armed Serbian will attack NATO army or Russian army in this chaotic situation. If USA soldier died more and more, although USA do not want to give up this chance to control EU, US will have to run away like in African Somali because the internal press from American. C. Before give up Kosovo, US-UK will injure Yugoslavia as possible as they could. Unluckily, sooner Milosevic will be annihilated, more chaotic the situation will be, and sooner US army will have to give up Kosovo for intangible attacking. D. After the running away of USA, could others stay or not? If others will go on staying, the casualty will be bigger and bigger, and expense will be cost increasingly. If run away either, the situation will not be able to control and whole Balkan will be chaos. Fr-De-It could do nothing but wait the other parts of Europe being affected. E. It is important to emphasize that this result is also good for USA. At that time, although the US-EU union will not be build and the multi-pole world will be form, the situation will be very advantageous to US. Because EU has decrease, no one could challenge his status in a long time. As long as Fr-De-It obey the arrangement of US-UK about Kosovo, whatever the Kosovo crisis change: better or worse, the result will be advantaged to US-UK. This crisis is a god-given gambling for US to control EU. If the action succeed, US will build his supremacy at once. If fail, US will lose nothing. The second way is to choice being a free power center. It is easy either. Of course, if there had not outbreak Kosovo crisis, it would be more advantage, but EU will not realize the real face of US-UK either. Now it is not too late. If EU actively act by himself, the situation perhaps will be change. Of course EU has his idea, but THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS THAT EU HAVE ABILITY TO CONTROL ALL KINDS OF PROBABILITY, to obtain this ability, I think there is no way unless EU actively touch with Russia and Yugoslavia. NATO IS NOT EU AND ALL THE MORE IS NOT EUROPE. Yugoslavia' puniness is good for NATO but is not good for EU and Europe now. If EU touch with Russia even provide help and try for benefit for Ru-Yu, Kosovo will not be an awful dream to Europe. A. If there are no hope to solve this crisis, EU could use the Russia and Yugoslavia to hamper US-UK and UCK although EU could not direct control UCK. Then, the situation will be controlled and the press from USA will be withstood. The crisis will not expand or affect other part of Europe. B. If there have chance to solve this crisis, Fr-De-It could actively act as moderator when US-UK and UCK is in confrontation with Ru-Yu. While the crisis has been solved, the international status of EU will increase highly. C. If US-UK run away from Kosovo at once and the UCK make chaos, EU could unite with Russia or Yugoslavia at once either, and then the crisis will be able to control again. The crisis will not deteriorate and expand. D. If USA could not control UCK and the whole situation become worse, the government of Yugoslavia could control Serbian and his power will attack UCK. Then the chaos will only remain in Yugoslavia. Is there any third way: not united with USA or Ru-Yu? If Kosovo had not broken out, maybe there would be a third way. Unluckily, if EU is hesitant, the situation will be controlled by USA and will changed to be propitious to USA. To sum up, the Kosovo crisis is the crucial point that EU decide his fate. If only resisting not to unite with US-UK and follow them, and resisting to touch with Ru-Yu and build affinity, the Kosovo crisis will be controlled by EU before being solved. Then, the Kosovo crisis will not become a tool to control EU and EU still has chance to choice being free power center. I can foretell that the Euro will increase and be hardness at that time. However, the action must be quick and active. _____________________________________________ 首都在线--先进中国人的网上家园 http://www.263.net 免费邮箱 邮件杂志 签名邮件 邮件加密 邮件追身呼 搜索引擎 个人站点 在线游戏 网上聊天 网上挂号 金融王国 在线杀毒 跳蚤市场 软件下载 休闲娱乐